To the Saga synthesis top

Summaries of (municipalities equal portion: decision level) such as the restoration judgment ratios based on 2015 financial statements

The last update date:

The situation of 1 restoration judgment ratio

(1) The real deficit ratio

In the prefecture municipalities (20 groups), group where the real income and expenditure has a deficit cries (all groups surplus) and collects, and there is no calculation.

※The real income and expenditure is sum except resources which you should transfer from the annual revenue annual expenditure deduction (the format income and expenditure) to the next fiscal year to devote to carrying forward light costs.

(2) The ratio substantially deficit connection

As there is not group with connection substance minus balance in the prefecture municipalities (20 groups), there is no calculation.

※With the connection substance deficit ratio as deficit of all accounts and add up surplus whole local public entity make deficit degree index, and show the degree of aggravation of financial administration as the whole local public entities.

 

(3) The real national debt service ratio

      "Permission group" which needs permission for issuance of financial reproduction standard (35%), early restoration standard (25%) and local bond in the prefecture municipalities (20 groups) (more than 18%)

      It was less than this.

※With the real national debt service ratio, we make size of sum according to refundment of borrowed money (local bond) and this index and show degree of fund raising.

 

(4) The future burden ratio

In the prefecture municipalities (20 groups), it was less than early restoration standard (350%).

※With the burden ratio, we will make the balance at the present such as borrowed money (local bond) such as general accounts or burden that we may pay in the future on local public entity index in the future and show the degree of possibility to press finance in the future.

The situation of 2 lack of funds ratios

There was not thing which produced deficiency of fund and, in all government enterprise (81 accounts), was less than management restoration standard (20%).

※With the lack of funds ratio, we make lack of funds of government enterprise index in comparison with scale of rate income that is business scale of government enterprise and show the degree of aggravation of financial condition.

  

※As for the restoration judgment ratios based on 2015 financial statements, it is (decision level) table

1 restoration judgment ratio

       ※Restoration standard early parenthesis under the restoration judgment ratio name writing

                                                                                                                    (unit :%)

No

Municipalities name 

Real deficit
The ratio
(11.25-15%) 

   Connection substance
   The deficit ratio
 (16.25-20%)

    Real national debt service

    The ratio

   (25%)

 The future burden ratio
(350%)

 1

Saga-shi

-

     -       3.4

-

 2

Karatsu-shi

-

     -       15.2

128.2

 3

Tosu-shi

-

     -       10.2

-

 4

Taku-shi

-

     -       11.0

-

 5

Imari-shi

-

     -       16.3

96.1

 6

Takeo-shi

-

     -       7.9

21.7

 7

Kashima-shi

-

     -       8.0

68.9

 8

Ogi-shi

-

     -       6.6

-

 9

Ureshino-shi

-

     -       7.7

78.4

10

Kanzaki-shi

-

     -       13.5

31.4

11

Yoshinogari-cho

-

     -       11.0

-

12

Kiyama-cho

-

     -       13.1

24.2

13

Kamimine-cho

-

     -       15.4

-

14

Miyaki-cho

-

     -       11.6

34.6

15

Genkai-cho

-

     -       3.7

-

16

Arita-cho

-

     -       7.6

55.1

17

Omachi-cho

-

     -       7.0

43.3

18

Kouhoku-machi

-

     -       12.0

-

19

Shiroishi-cho

-

     -       6.9

3.4

20

Tara-cho

-

     -       4.9

-

(note) when there is not minus balance real minus balance or connection substantially; and the real national debt service ratio or

   When the burden ratio is not calculated in the future, we list with "-".

 

2 lack of funds ratios

No

Group name
(we run government enterprise

Including office work cooperative) 

The lack of funds ratio
(management restoration standard = 20%) 

 1

 Saga-shi

-

 2

 Karatsu-shi

-

 3

 Tosu-shi

-

 4

 Taku-shi

-

 5

 Imari-shi

-

 6

 Takeo-shi

-

 7

 Kashima-shi

-

 8

 Ogi-shi

-

 9

 Ureshino-shi

-

 10

 Kanzaki-shi

-

 11

 Yoshinogari-cho

-

 12

 Kiyama-cho

-

 13

 Kamimine-cho

-

 14

 Miyaki-cho

-

 15

 Genkai-cho

-

 16

 Arita-cho

-

 17

 Omachi-cho

-

 18

 Kouhoku-machi

-

 19

 Shiroishi-cho

-

 20

 Tara-cho

-

 21

 West Saga water supply company group

-

 22

 Kishima water for industrial use way company group

-

 23

 Imari, Arida district medical care welfare association

-

 24

 East Saga water supply company group

-

 25

 West Saga wide area Channel company group

-

 (note) when there is not deficiency of fund, list with "-".

We relate to this page
Inquiry
(ID: 50221)
Saga prefectural government office (corporation number 1000020410004) 〒 840-8570  1-1-59, Jonai, Saga-shi   Tel: 0952-24-2111 (main)     
Copyright© 2016 Saga Prefecture.All Rights Reserved.

Saga prefectural government office (corporation number 1000020410004)

〒840-8570
1-1-59, Jonai, Saga-shi
Tel: 0952-24-2111 (main)
Copyright© 2016 Saga Prefecture.All Rights Reserved.